- Expert Academic and Article Professional Writing Service
- +1 323 471 4575
- academicperfect@gmail.com
The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level
The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level
The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level (FTPL) is a macroeconomic theory that seeks to explain the determination of the price level through government fiscal policy, rather than through monetary policy or other factors.
According to the FTPL, the price level is determined by the government’s budget constraint, which states that government spending must be equal to its revenue. If the government spends more than it earns, it must finance the difference through borrowing or printing money, which ultimately leads to inflation.
In other words, the FTPL asserts that the government’s fiscal stance and the market’s perception of that stance are the key determinants of the price level. If the government increases spending or reduces taxes, this will put upward pressure on the price level. Conversely, if the government reduces spending or increases taxes, this will put downward pressure on the price level.
The FTPL has its origins in the work of Abba Lerner, a British economist who developed the theory of functional finance in the 1940s. Lerner argued that the government should focus on achieving full employment and price stability, rather than balancing the budget. He believed that if the government spent enough to create full employment, any resulting inflation could be controlled through taxation.
The modern FTPL was developed in the 1990s by a group of economists including Christopher Sims, Eric Leeper, and Troy Davig. They built on the work of Lerner and other economists who had explored the link between fiscal policy and the price level.
One of the key insights of the FTPL is that monetary policy is not independent of fiscal policy. In traditional macroeconomic models, monetary policy is seen as the primary tool for controlling inflation. However, the FTPL argues that the central bank cannot control inflation if the government is running an unsustainable fiscal policy. If the government is spending too much or running large deficits, the central bank will be forced to monetize the debt or engage in other inflationary policies to prevent a financial crisis.
Another important implication of the FTPL is that the government’s debt is not necessarily a burden on future generations. In traditional economic models, government debt is seen as a liability that must be paid back in the future. However, the FTPL argues that if the government spends the borrowed funds on productive investments that generate future income, the debt can be easily serviced and even paid off without causing inflation.
Critics of the FTPL argue that it ignores the role of expectations in determining the price level. They point out that the theory assumes that market participants have perfect knowledge of the government’s fiscal stance and respond rationally to changes in that stance. In reality, expectations are often shaped by psychological factors, political considerations, and other factors that are difficult to model.
Despite its limitations, the FTPL has gained popularity among some economists and policymakers as a way to understand the relationship between fiscal policy and inflation. It has been used to explain a range of macroeconomic phenomena, from the inflationary pressures caused by large fiscal stimulus programs to the deflationary effects of austerity measures.
In conclusion, the FTPL is a macroeconomic theory that links the determination of the price level to government fiscal policy. It suggests that the government’s budget constraint and the market’s perception of that constraint are the primary drivers of inflation. While it has its critics, the FTPL has gained attention as a way to understand the complex interplay between fiscal policy, monetary policy, and the macroeconomy.
The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
