Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages The Health Policy Research Paper
Description/Paper Instructions
The Health Policy Research Paper
The purpose of this assignment is to have the student complete a self-reflection on skills and traits the student already possesses as nurse and how these skills can be translated in political competency. This assignment supports professional formation, enhanced communication, and relevant skills associated with political competency for the DNP practice scholar.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 4: Build political competency to enhance and support professional identity formation (PO 2).
CO 3: Demonstrate the DNP leadership role in the development and implementation of health policy to improve healthcare delivery and outcomes (PO 9).
Due Date(s)
The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.
The assignment is due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 2.
Total points possible: 150
Preparing the Assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. You may write this narrative paper in the first person using personal pronouns.
- Complete the activity in the Week 2 Explore section
- Write a narrative paper where you will need to identify strengths and skills you already possess as a nurse. Then, discuss how these skills can be translated into political capital. Using examples of what this political capital would look like is a great way to showcase how your current skills can be translated effectively.
This paper is not the same as the one written in NR703 as the focus is not on leadership but rather on political competency.
- The following areas must be addressed:
- Introduction
- Practice and Leadership Strengths
- Identify 3 practice and leadership strengths
- Propose how you can translate these 3 skills to promote your political capital
- Relationship and Collaboration
- Identify 3 examples of where you excel in relationship development and collaboration
- Propose how can you translate these 3 skills to promote your political capital
- Effective Communication
- Identify 3 examples of where you excel in communication
- Propose how you can translate these 3 skills to promote your political capital
- Persuasion and Persistence
- Identify 3 examples of where you excelled in persistence and persuasion
- Propose how you can translate these 3 skills to promote your political capital
- Conclusion
- Well-rounded and comprehensive conclusion
- Summarizes the paper
- Provides a call to action
- Clarity of Writing
- Use standard English grammar and sentence structure
- There should be no spelling errors or typographical errors
- Paper should be organized around the required components using appropriate headers.
- Paper needs to offer flow and logical progression
- APA/Formatting/References -All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA (current edition of the APA manual) format including:
- Document setup
- Title and reference pages
- Proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list
- Explore Activity Upload
- Upload the week 2 explore activity results to the assignment folder
Rubric
NR708: Political Strength to Strategies Assignment Rubric
NR708: Political Strength to Strategies Assignment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice & Leadership Strengths Requirements: Student identifies a minimum of 3 practice & leadership characteristics. Provides 3 examples translating current skills into political capital. (30 points)
30.0 pts Highest Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 3 examples of translation of current skills into political capital.
27.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 2 examples of translation of current skills into political capital.
24.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 1 example of translation of current skills into political capital.
0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance
No examples provided – requirements not met.
30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship and Collaboration Strengths Requirements: Student identifies a minimum of 3 relationship development and collaboration strengths. Provides 3 examples translating current skills into political capital. (30 Points)
30.0 pts Highest Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 3 examples of translation of current skills into political capital.
27.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 2 examples of translation of current skills into political capital.
24.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 1 example of translation of current skills into political capital.
0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance
No examples provided – requirements not met.
30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication Strengths Requirements: Student identifies a minimum of 3 communication strengths. Provides 3 examples translating current skills into political capital. (30 points)
30.0 pts Highest Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 3 examples of translation of current skills into political capital.
27.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 2 examples of translation of current skills into political capital.
24.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 1 example of translation of current skills into political capital.
0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance
No examples provided – requirements not met.
30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersuasion and Persistence Strengths Student identifies a minimum of 3 persuasian and persistence strengths. Provides 3 examples translating current skills into political capital. (30 points)
30.0 pts Highest Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 3 examples of translation of current skills into political capital.
27.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 2 examples of translation of current skills into political capital.
24.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance
Identifies strengths and provides 1 example of translation of current skills into political capital.
0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance
No examples provided – requirements not met.
30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion Requirements: Provide a 1) well-rounded and comprehensive conclusion that 2) summarizes the paper and 3) provides a call to action. (5 points)
5.0 pts Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements.
4.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.
2.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement.
0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance
No requirements for this section presented.
5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing. Requirements: 1) Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure. 2) No spelling errors or typographical errors. 3) Organized around the required components using appropriate headers. 4) Paper offers a flow and logical progression (10 points)
10.0 pts Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements.
9.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3-2 requirements.
8.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement.
0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance
No requirements for this section presented.
10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting/References Requirements: All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA (current edition of the APA manual) format. 1) Document setup 2) Title and reference pages 3) Proper in-the text citations are used, and included in a properly formatted reference list (10 points)
10.0 pts Highest Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements.
9.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.
8.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement.
0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance
No requirements for this section presented.
10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 2 EXPLORE Activity Upload Week 2 Explore Activity uploaded to the Assignment Folder (5 points)
5.0 pts Highest Level of Performance
Week 2 EXPLORE activity Uploaded
0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance
Week 2 EXPLORE activity not uploaded
5.0 pts Total Points: 150.0
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
The Health Policy Research Paper
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.