Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
The Literary Analysis Argumentative Essay
The Literary Analysis Argumentative Essay
White paper two, argumentative essay two is upon us and you are more ready now than you were for the first essay!
Again, consider all that we have covered up to this point. With a focus on reading critically, identifying literary elements, connecting the elements used to each other in an effort to uncover what the author means (And no, there is no one meaning – everyone will interpret differently) you will write an analysis NOT A SUMMARY but an analysis of the essay.
Here are your specs:
POV: Third Person ONLY
Word Count: Minimum 1500
Primary Source: “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July” by Fredrick Douglass
Secondary: At least three
Works Cited Page: Absolutely
Borrowed material: At least six instances of borrowed material
Things to consider:
PURPOSE: Remember, this is not an expository essay, it is an argumentative essay. Therefore you should be starting with your thesis statement, ensuring that the thesis addressed the topic in a way that motivated the reader to want to respond.
BORROWED MATERIAL: Be selective when choosing the borrowed material. Don’t just find something to throw in the essay and cite it. That is not productive at all, not to mention it will get you a frowning face!
Let your borrowed material, since you are reading the sources BEFORE you write the paper, be your guide.
As you write, annotate, make note of what you like. Keep it. Then figure out how you can use it in your essay.
REVISE AND EDIT: I cannot stress this enough. You MUST give yourself time to revise and edit your paper. There may be paragraphs that would fit better in a different section of the essay. There will definitely be errors. Give yourself time to revise and edit in order to submit the best paper possible!
I recommend that you save each draft separately, for example, “Essay 1 Draft 1”, “Essay 1 Draft 2”, Essay 1 Draft 3” and so on and so on. Doing so ensures that you keep all the original content just the way it came out, but as you make changes the previous copy or copies remain in their original state. There is no worse writer’s feeling that revising and edit, erasing what you previously wrote, only to realize you need it.
STAY IN THE LITERATURE. CRITIQUE THE LITERATURE. DO NOT WRITE AN ESSAY INSPIRED BY THE TOPIC OF THE LITERATURE. YOU’LL GET A FROWNING FACE. –
A huge mistake is to understand the literature, be able to identify the topic, and instead of writing about the literature, you write about the topic the literature covers.
For example, “The Story of an Hour” presents an unhappy wife during a time when women had no other options than to be a wife.
If a student were to write an essay exploring how different being a wife is now to how it was then, and how wrong it was during that time in history for women not to have options, and how . . . Well, hopefully you get it.
This essay would receive an unfavorable grade.
It does not critique the writing. It creates a completely separate work inspired by the writing. Even if this essay has little “speckles” of Mrs. Mallard’s thoughts and actions, it still would not be about the essay. It would only use those “speckles” to fulfill the borrowed material requirement. The presence of those speckles would be meaningless.
White Paper 2 – Argumentative Essay 2White Paper 2 – Argumentative Essay 2CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurposeThe essay meets the expectations of argumentation. The essay demonstrates mastery of the close and or critical reading process.
The essay is argumentative in nature, in language, theme, and tone and only uses expository form as context for interpretation. The essay avoids summary completely. However, may paraphrase very small sections of the primary source ONLY to give the reader context.15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction The introduction is well written, contains no more than 3 errors in grammar and or punctuation, is free of any borrowed material (quotes unless they are popular sayings), grabs the reader’s attention, and presents a thesis statement as well as a smooth transition out of the introductory paragraph and into the first body paragraph.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis statementThe thesis is easily identifiable, is strong, specifies the topic, provides and argumentative statement directly addressing the primary source, is well written – free from any errors in grammar and or punctuation, is free of jargon, and is written in the preferred third person POV. Second person POV is NOT allowed for the thesis statement.15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe bodyEach body paragraph contains one, and only one, main idea. That main idea directly and purposely supports the thesis statement.
Each body paragraph contains, at minimum, three sentences that support the main idea and at least one transition sentence that transitions into and or out of the idea presented.
Each body paragraph contains no more than three errors in grammar and or punctuation.
Each body paragraph contains at least one quote from a secondary or the primary source.
Ideas presented in the body paragraph are presented in a logical and sequential manner.
Each idea presented in the body of the essay is thoroughly developed and the writer does not “drop” a number of major ideas into the paragraph without elaborating on the major idea presented before moving on to another idea.
There are smooth transitions from one idea to another within the body paragraphs themselves and between body paragraphs.25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMLA FormatThe essay contains the following, formatted correctly:
Heading (on one page only)
The margins are set to 1 inch all around.
The font is 12 pont, for all text.
The title is centered.
The title is unique and represents your writing. It does not bear the same title as the primary work or a combination of the assignment title and the title of the primary work.
The font is Times Roman, for all text.
All paragraphs have the first sentence indented.
All borrowed materials are cited and cited properly according to the MLA resource provided.
All borrowed material is directly relevant to the immediate preceding interpretation.
The Works Cited page is titled properly and entries on the Works Cited page are all inclusive of the borrowed material throughout the text.
Works Cited entries are formatted properly according to the MLA resource provided.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionThe conclusion is strong and summarizing all the information delivered in the essay, free of any errors in grammar and or punctuation, free of any “new” information, and finishes with a hard hitting, fun, fascinating, or intriguing statement.5.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0PreviousNext
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
The Literary Analysis Argumentative Essay
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.