The Population Challenging Key to Global Survival Case Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
The Population Challenging Key to Global Survival Case Assignment
This paper was researched and written by Terry M. Redding, a communications consultant with a Master of Arts in applied anthropology.
Number 2, 2007
The Population Challenge: Key to Global Survival
The 21st Century Papers are a public affairs series made available as a public service by the Population Institute to policy makers and journalists in developing and industrialized countries. Contributors of $100 or more annually to the Population Institute receive copies free of charge, upon request. Single copies of
this edition may be purchased for $3.00 plus $1.25 for postage. Orders of more than 30 copies can be obtained for $2.00 per copy plus postage. Please make checks payable to:
Treasurer, Population Institute 107 2nd Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002
Copyright The Population Institute 2007
Acronyms
APPG All Party Parliamentary Group (UK)
CPIA Country Policy and Institutional Assessment
DRC Democratic Republic of Congo
FAO Food and Agricultural Organization (UN)
FfP Fund for Peace
GDP Gross domestic product
IDA International Development Agency
LICUS Low Income countries under stress
MDG Millennium Development Goal
MMRs Maternal mortality ratios
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
UN United Nations
UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNFPA United National Population Fund
UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund
WHO World Health Organization
1
THE POPULATION CHALLENGE: KEY TO GLOBAL SURVIVAL
Neglecting the Human Connection
Stabilizing the growth of the world’s human population is a goal that must be achieved if we are to preserve our options for the future and improve the odds for the world’s sustainability. Challenges such as climate change and global warming, fragile and failed states, migration and refugee crises, food and water insecurity, poverty, disease, debt, and illiteracy are caused or exacerbated by unchecked rapid population growth.
Discussions on addressing these challenges, however, often neglect serious consideration of high fertility and family planning. Former U.S. President Bill Clinton singled out population growth as the key issue that candidates in the 2008 presidential election were avoiding.1 This is puzzling and troubling, as population growth is the single world issue that binds all the others together; it is the root of many problems affecting the tree of humanity.
Indeed, trees provide an apt analogy to the current global reality: In countries with quality reproductive health services and policies serving as the roots, the branches—including economics, health, and education—are stable. As this paper will demonstrate, in countries with poor reproductive health services and policies for their roots, many branches are not healthy and cannot thrive; the tree may even fail. Just as the health and even the survival of a tree rely on strong roots, the health and viability of a country and indeed the planet can be traced to population.
Still, unlike many other global problems and crises, the technology to meet the population challenge is readily available and extremely cost effective, if we have the will to supply it to those in need.
By the year 2050, world population is projected to grow from its current 6.7 billion to 9.3 billion2; less optimistic calculations, based on fertility not declining from 2006 rates, place the figure at nearly 12 billion.3 Practically all growth is esti- mated to occur in the developing countries, especially in the poorest of those coun- tries, which already produce virtually all of the world’s human numbers.
While many nations have reduced rapid population growth, more than 3 bil- lion people currently under 25 years old will soon enter their prime reproductive years. Providing this largest youth generation in history with appropriate sexual and reproductive health services and education is essential to ease poverty, increase edu- cational opportunities, preserve the environment, improve health, and provide political security. Meeting this challenge will be especially important in developing countries considered “fragile states,” wherein booming populations would further stress already limited resources.
For population growth to slow and birthrates decline, Christopher Flavin, President of the Worldwatch Institute, has said, “It is essential that women and men
around the world have increased access to sound information, a range of contracep- tive options, and related health services. Access to voluntary family planning allows women and couples to time their births and choose the size of their families.”4
But at this critical moment, international support for family planning ser- vices faces ongoing annual reductions as the political climate has chilled and funds from many sectors are diverted to HIV/AIDS programs. In many countries, contra- ceptive use has risen only slowly or has stalled.5
Ironically, in many developing countries, sexual and reproductive health education and services, especially meeting family planning needs, presents a cost- effective component in mitigating any of the above-mentioned issues.
The Challenge of Unmet Need
At the core of addressing population growth is managing unmet need. There is well docu- mented unmet need for family plan- ning, especially among the 2 billion people living on less than $2 a day.
Slower population growth offers a demographic dividend, allowing a country to invest more in education and health, thus serving the broader agendas of social and economic development.6,7
It is also recognized that women are at the center of repro- ductive health efforts and address- ing unmet need. As demographer Ruth Dixon-Mueller explains:
Population control policies and programs would probably be unnecessary if women could exercise their basic economic, political and social rights and genuine reproductive choice. In addition, programs need to address the widespread unmet need in many countries for reproductive health services that would enable women to regulate the timing of their childbearing and, in particular, help women to avoid unwanted and mistimed pregnancies and unsafe abortion. 8
The definition of unmet need has undergone refinements over 25 years of discussion, but the basic objective is to estimate the proportion of women not using contraception who either want to cease further childbearing or want to postpone the next birth at least two years.9 The greatest need is in sub-Saharan Africa, where an average of 26 percent of married women are in the unmet need category.10 Other reports estimate the need among never-married women at 9 percent.11
2
Health
Poverty
Education
Security
Food
Water
POPULATION
Population is the foundation that enables succession in other sectors
3
One calculation shows 113.6 million women (both married and unmarried) have an unmet need for contraception in the developing world.12 The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that over 120 million couples worldwide do not use contraceptives, despite wishing to limit or space their children.13
While unmet need has lessened globally in recent decades, there are many more women now, in absolute numbers, than in years past, and many more young- er women. Today there are almost 3 billion people under the age of 25, the largest generation of young people in history, 87 percent of whom live in the developing world. Meeting their sexual and reproductive health needs is central to their well being, as well as to population stabilization, poverty reduction, and sustainable development. The decisions of this “critical cohort” in the timing, sizing and spac- ing of their families will be a key factor in whether world population growth will be stabilized.14
Where the need is met, family planning services work. In the 28 most popu- lous countries receiving U.S. family planning assistance, the average number of children per family has dropped from 6.1 in the 1960s to 4.2 in 2003. In Colombia, Indonesia, and Mexico, the family average is three children, and in Taiwan and Thailand, early recipients of U.S. assistance, the average is two children.15
The West African country of Ghana made family planning a public health priority in the early 1980s, and since then modern contraceptive use among mar- ried women has risen from 5.2 percent in 1988 to 18.7 percent in 2003. Ghana’s rate of 64 infant deaths per 1,000 live births stands out from the regional average of 100 deaths, and the rate of HIV infection (2.2 percent) is half the West African average.16
Further, one estimate shows that family planning services are preventing three-quarters of the induced abortions that would otherwise occur in the develop- ing world.17 In addition, if every woman in the developing world with unmet need for a modern method used one, 52 million unintended pregnancies could be avoid- ed annually.
Of the 46 million pregnancies that are terminated every year, only 60 per- cent are carried out under safe conditions. Almost all unsafe abortions take place in the developing world, with South America having the highest ratio. Although age patterns differ regionally, two-thirds of unsafe abortions occur among women aged 15 to 30.18
The Cost-Effective Alternative
Prevention would seem a better policy. The cost to provide the services and supplies is estimated at $3.9 billion annually, but the savings would be much greater.
One example cited is a typical low-fertility Latin American country where every dollar spent on family planning saves $12 in health and education costs.19 Unfortunately, inflation-adjusted family planning spending has fallen since the mid- 1990s. In the United States, President Bush’s requests for overseas family planning
4
program funding has been reduced from $425 million during the tenure of Secretary of State Colin Powell to $357 million under Secretary Condoleezza Rice.
The $34 million appropriated by Congress annually to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) but blocked by the Bush administration, by one esti- mate, could have prevented 2 million unintentional pregnancies, nearly 800,000 abortions, 4,700 maternal deaths, and 77,000 infant and child deaths.20
The planet now carries more people of child-bearing age than ever before, and yet a desired and cost-effective component in addressing the world’s booming population is largely ignored in most policy discussions. The funds invested now in population programs will prevent conflicts, benefit the planet, and yield higher returns than any other investments in humanity’s future. A convergence of potential calamities looms; offering couples the freedom to determine their own fertility is perhaps the only practical, the only realistic, option.
The Population Challenging Key to Global Survival Case Assignment
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.