Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages The Root Cause Analysis Research Paper
The Root Cause Analysis Research Paper
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is popular and often-used a technique that helps people answer the question of why the problem occurred in a certain place or a certain situation. For my final project, our group is going to analyze the intercultural communication problems that Dolce & Gabbana faced when it promoted its products to Chinese customers.
We used the specific case that Dolce & Gabbana launched a racist advertisement. One thing to be aware of in this case is the information transfer through social media in the intercultural context. So, we need to know what happened, why it happened, and what to do to reduce the likelihood that it will happen again.
In order to perform root cause analyses, I basically have used two techniques, asking questions and using the “Fishbone Tool”. Through this week’s reading, we know that the surprising power of questions. Although this article analyzes the power of questions more based on the interpersonal communication context, I think it is also very useful for us to do root cause analyses.
Before I started the analysis, I asked several questions to myself, like “Why Dolce & Gabbana released this AD?”, “Who designed this advertisement?”, and “Is the heroine in the AD Chinese or a foreigner?”. As John and Brooks (2018) said, asking questions is an unlocking learning process.
By asking questions, I can learn and collect more information, so that I can know more about this case. At the same time, it will allow me to ask deeper questions. Step by step, the analysis will go deeper and deeper. Compared to “Asking questions”, the “Fishbone Tool” is more effective when used in a team.
“A cause and effect diagram often called a “Fishbone” diagram, can help in brainstorming to identify possible causes of a problem and in sorting ideas into useful categories” (API, n.d.). The first and most important thing is to state the problem and then classify the causes of the problem. This approach focuses on teamwork, so it requires brainstorming and discussion to identify all possible causes. Then, ask again why.
Case analysis is teamwork. In addition to individual analysis and opinions, the analysis of other team members is equally important. Therefore, for me personally, I adopted the way of asking questions. For the group discussion, we used the “Fishbone Tool”.
API (n.d.), How to Use the Fishbone Toole for Root Cause Analysis. Retrieved May 2, 2020,
Brooks, Alison Wood, and Leslie K. John. The Surprising Power of Questions. Harvard
Business Review 96, no. 3 (May–June 2018): 60–67.
Root cause analysis is an approach for identifying the underlying causes of an incident so that the most effective solutions can be identified and implemented. It’s typically used when something goes badly, but can also be used when something goes well.
Implementing RCA will help an organization to identify barriers and the causes of problems, so that permanent solutions can be found, to develop a logical approach to problem-solving, using data that already exists in the agency and to identify current and future needs for organizational improvement. (Jelinek, 2019).
Establish repeatable, step-by-step processes, in which one process can confirm the results of another. Within an organization, root cause analysis is fundamentally connected by three basic questions. What’s the problem? Why did it happen? What will be done to prevent it from happening again?
Our final project is to identify the problems within Disney’s theme park opened in France and to make suggestions and recommendations to the problems identified. In order to conduct the RCA, we firstly need to define the problems.
Then, our team will collect the data and information regarding the problems. Thirdly, we will identify the cause of the problems and prioritize the causes. Fourthly, we will collect the solutions that other organizations used to deal with similar problems. Lastly, we will pick up some possible solutions from other cases, brainstorm some solutions and customized the solutions to make sure that they will be suitable for Disney’s problems.
According to this week’s course material, we understand the power of asking questions. Before we start to analyze the case, we should have some questions in our mind.
For example, why Disney had done well in its American and Janpanese market? What did its French customers think about the theme park? With these questions, our team are better directed when collecting the data and information.
Jelinek, J. (2019). Root Cause Analysis. Washington State Department of Enterprise Services. Retrieved from: https://des.wa.gov/services/risk-management/about-risk-management/enterprise-risk-management/root-cause-analysis
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! The Root Cause Analysis Research Paper
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.