Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
The Shooting of Victim Essay
The Shooting of Victim Essay
‘Where’s my justice?’ shooting victim wonders as former Marine gets probation By DALE VINCENT
New Hampshire Union Leader
MANCHESTER — “Where’s my justice? Where’s my justice?” shooting victim Josephine Otim cried Tuesday as she stood outside the courtroom where the former Marine who pulled the trigger was placed on probation for five years.
Hillsborough County Superior Court North Judge Gillian Abramson said she didn’t believe the New Hampshire State Prison system could give Thomas Landry, now 27, the treatment he needs for his Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). She gave him suspended sentences of 7 1/2 to 15 years and 3 1/2 to seven years for the random shooting in which Otim was injured.
Abramson acknowledged that Otim, the mother of a young child, had come to this country from war-torn Sudan, “expecting and deserving sanctuary and security.”
But on the night of July 15, 2013, Otim was shot as she sat in friend Shaquwan’da Allen’s car on Somerville Street after completing a double shift as an LNA at a Bedford nursing home.
Landry, who police said had been drinking the night of the shooting and was on various medications — 26 prescription bottles bearing his name were found at his residence — walked up to Allen’s car, so close that if she had opened the door it would have hit him. It was then he fired the Sig Sauer P229 he carried in a back waist holster and hit Otim in the leg. After two surgeries, she still walks with a limp.
“I’ve been through wars …,” Otim said Tuesday in court. “You took me to the worst nightmare of my life … I can’t trust anyone because of you.”
Landry pleaded guilty to felonies of first-degree assault and criminal threatening.
The medical director for the New Hampshire State Prison System, Dr. David Potenza, told Abramson Tuesday there were programs, including medications, for veterans and other men with PTSD at the state prisons. But Landry’s new Massachusetts clinical psychologist, Dr. William Newman, said that his methods could “cure” Landry of his PTSD.
He said his treatment includes hypnosis, yoga and tai chi, meditation and mindfulness, but no medications; he has been seeing Landry twice a week since September.
“I’m optimistic about his prognosis,” Newman said.
Newman told Abramson he doesn’t believe Landry would be helped in prison. “They give medication and I know that’s not going to work,” he said.
Abramson said she was impressed with Landry’s reported progress and that he entered a plea that eliminated the need for a trial that would further traumatize Otim and Allen.
Saying the two women may not agree with her sentence, Abramson said: “I ask that you trust me.”
If there is any violation of probation, she promised, Landry will go to prison.
Conditions of the suspended sentences include 500 hours of community service within 18 months, continued in- and out-patient counseling, alcohol and drug screening, restitution to his victim and the victim compensation fund and a letter of apology to Otim and Allen.
Landry, who lived near the shooting scene at the time but now lives in Massachusetts, is barred from any contact with the two women and is barred from possessing firearms.
Abramson ordered review hearings every 90 days and said any violation of probation, which will include random urinalysis to ensure Landry isn’t using alcohol or marijuana, will result in a termination of probation and imposition of the jail sentences, which were suspended for 10 years and would be consecutive if imposed.
Assistant Hillsborough County Attorney Charlene Dulac, who had requested the prison sentences, said the night of the shooting Landry “lied to protect himself and avoid responsibility.” She said there’s no question he has a mental illness, but his “random and unprovoked attack … created another PTSD victim.”
Both the prosecution and defense can request sentence review by a three-judge panel.
‘Where’s my justice?’ shooting victim wonders as former Marine gets probation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
The Shooting of Victim Essay
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.