- Expert Academic and Article Professional Writing Service
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@essaysolver.com
The Traditional Approach of Operations Management Case Assignment
The Traditional Approach of Operations Management Case Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
The Traditional Approach of Operations Management Case Assignment
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________ Report Information from ProQuest May 07 2014 21:32 _______________________________________________________________
07 May 2014 ProQuest
Table of contents
- Environmental performance as an operations objective……………………………………………………………………. 1
07 May 2014 ii ProQuest
Document 1 of 1 Environmental performance as an operations objective Author: Jeronimo de Burgos Jimenez; Cespedes Lorente, Jose J ProQuest document link Abstract: The traditional approach of operations management has evaluated an organisation’s performance based on four main areas: cost, quality, time and service. However,
the necessity to introduce environmental protection measures in firms so as to achieve sustainable development has forced a redefinition of the operations function. This paper reviews the literature on operations management and environmental issues, in order to determine the role of operations in sustainability. The paper justifies the
need to include environmental performance as a new dimension of operations performance. Finally, the paper analyses environmental performance as an operations objective and present certain aspects that should be taken into account when measuring it. Links: Linking Service Full text: Headnote Keywords Environment, Operations
management, Sustainable development Headnote Abstract The traditional approach of operations management has evaluated an organisation’s performance based on four main areas: cost, quality, time and service. However, the necessity to introduce environmental protection measures in firms so as to achieve sustainable development
has forced a redefinition of the operations function. This paper reviews the literature on operations management and environmental issues, in order to determine the role of operations in sustainability. We justify the need to include environmental performance as a new dimension of operations performance. Finally, we analyse
environmental performance as an operations objective and present certain aspects that should be taken into account when measuring it. Introduction The relationship between the firm and the environment is receiving increasing attention in both professional and academic literature (Starik and Marcus, 2000). The rapid degradation of the
planet’s ecosystems has attracted the attention of the scientific world and, at the same time, has questioned the sustainability of the current economic system. Currently, debate on climatic change and biodiversity is becoming more commonplace in the corporate world, together with concern over water, air and soil pollution (Bansal and
Howard, 1997; Hoffman, 2000). Thus, the notion of sustainable development has been established in firms in order to redefine their social and environmental responsibilities (Hart, 1995; Stanwick and Stanwick, 1998; Nash, 2000). According to the World Commission on Environment and Development (1987, p. 43) sustainable
development is that which “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. In short, sustainability is achieved when resource extraction (of energy and natural resources) from the ecological system occurs within the carrying capacity of the resource base, and when waste
transfer to the physical components of the ecological systems does not exceed the assimilative capacity of the particular ecosystems Jennings and Zandbergen, 1995, p. 1019). From a corporate point of view, sustainability entails fitting organisational systems into the broader social and ecological systems (Shrivastava, 1995a).
Although the sustainability of economic development is a shared responsibility of, at least, business, governments and consumers (Schmidheiny, 1992; Klassen, 1993; Shrivastava, 1995b), the corporate role in slowing down the planet’s environmental degradation is particularly relevant (Hawken, 1993; Shrivastava, 1995b). Firms have
financial resources, technological knowledge and institutional capability, as well as international and long-term vision to find ecological solutions for environmental problems (Schmidheiny, 1992).
07 May 2014 Page 1 of 17 ProQuest
http://search.proquest.com/docview/232333630?accountid=35812
Furthermore, it is possibly in their interest to spearhead the search for environmental solutions (Coddington, 1993; Welford, 1995) since, in many cases, there is a competitive advantage to be attained from environmental questions (Schmidheiny, 1992; Elkington, 1994; Porter and van der Linde, 1995; Hart, 1995). Firms can, therefore,
contribute individually towards sustainable development by innovating in their products and processes in order to use raw materials more efficiently, improve their corporate or product image, reduce the risks stemming from environmental responsibility or improve working conditions. These innovations may contribute towards
simultaneously achieving economic, environmental and social objectives. In this way, the socalled win-win-win situation has arisen, where there is an improvement in environmental performance, customer satisfaction, and company performance (Elkington, 1994; Florida, 1996; Maslennikova and Foley, 2000). However, in order to move
towards environmental sustainability, firms need to recognise that environmental matters do not merely restrict their actions, but, rather, form part of their own strategy (Hart, 1995; Shrivastava, 1995b; Hoffman, 2000). The general debate over the relationship between the company and environmental sustainability has taken root in the
field of operations management (Gupta, 1995; Inman, 1999; Angell and Klassen, 1999). There are at least two circumstances that relate environmental strategy with operations. First, it is generally accepted that the firm’s main contributions to sustainable development arise from the integration of environmental requirements into industrial
products and processes (Schmidheiny, 1992; Porter and van der Linde, 1995). This is because the development and implementation of environmental technologies necessarily have to take the operations area into account (Azzone and Bertele, 1994; Shrivastava, 1995a). In fact, product and process technologies make up the basic cost
and ecological impact parameters, since they determine the types of raw materials used, workers’ health and safety, ecological risk, materials efficiency, waste generated and disposal treatment (Sarkis, 1995). Second, there are both similarities and synergies between environmental protection improvement activities and programmes and
the operations methods and techniques already in place (Corbett and Van Wassenhove, 1993b; Sarkis, 1995; Inman, 1999). Thus, programmes for keeping pollution under control, zero waste, or design for the environment may reinforce traditional operations management techniques and procedures such as statistical process control, total
quality control (TQC), total quality management (TQM), or design for manufacturability (DfM). Therefore, environmental management programmes and policies should be developed taking into account and reinforcing operations strategy (Gupta, 1995). This implies widening the objectives and performance evaluation of this area in order
to include environmental questions (Angell, 1993), as well as orientating the main operations decisions (Gupta and Sharma, 1996; Inman, 1999; Angell and Klassen, 1999). The main objective of this article is to contribute towards the debate on the role of the operations function in environmental sustainability. After reviewing the literature
on operations management and the natural environment, we suggest a way in which to integrate environmental protection in the operations strategy so as to support corporate strategy. As in Angell’s (1993) proposal, we suggest that including environmental performance as an operations objective could be the first step towards
developing an environmentally sustainable strategy. In this way, operations management would support the organisation’s competitive edge improving environmental performance, as well as the traditional objectives of cost, quality, time and service. Likewise, we indicate how this new objective of the operations function can be measured
and how it can affect some of the main decisions of the sub-system. Finally, we establish the principal conclusions of the paper, which suggest new challenges for research into operations strategy. Environmental protection in the company and in operations management Environmental problems have been tackled from two different
perspectives (Hoffman, 2000, p. 9). The traditional approach concentrates on the debate concerning the observing of environmental legislation and the firms’ social responsibility. The second approach, which is related to environmental sustainability, implies that managers must accept that the firm’s overall strategy and environmental
questions inevitably go hand in hand.
07 May 2014 Page 2 of 17 ProQuest
The Traditional Approach of Operations Management Case Assignment
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Why Work With Us!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.
