Time Frames for Moving Issues Up the Chain
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Time Frames for Moving Issues Up the Chain
Escalation: processes and time frames for moving issues up the chain.
Notes: Provide the scope of adding comments or notes for all to record.
Why is the communication plan vital for project success?
Communication is critical to project success. Project managers need to speak the language of different stakeholders while being an empathetic listener (Larson & Gray, 2021). The project manager uses communication to coordinate efforts continuously to ensure the project is flowing smoothly. Communications management is the key to project control, the essential element of project management. Without the benefit of a good communications management system, the processes involved in the development of a project from conception to completion can be seriously constrained (Oliver, 1983). Without a communication plan the decision-making process will lag, there will be unclear roles and responsibilities for upcoming communication schedules, less gathering of feedback at milestones, and there will be more potential to be behind on tasks, which can lead to fast-tracking or crashing and even project failure.
Who is the most important person or group on the communication and why?
When it comes to communication you need to have a sender and a receiver. The sender/ speaker and the receiver/listener are most important person/groups in the communication. Because senders/speakers are the person or group of people who are involved in sending or sharing information. Receivers/listeners are the people who receive information from the speakers/sender and must process it. Therefore, both speaker and listeners together make the effective communication process.
References
Kashyap, S. 9 Effective Communication Strategies to Connect Better with Your Team, retrieved on 6/22/22 from https://www.proofhub.com/articles/communication-strategiesLinks to an external site.
Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2021). Project Management: The Managerial Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oliver, C. E. (1983). Communications management. Project Management Quarterly, 14(1), 28–30.
PM 692 Video discussion 3 2022.docx Download PM 692 Video discussion 3 2022.docx
Student 2 Joshua
Joshua Andersen
Park University
PM692 Communication, Risk, and Stakeholder Management
Dr. Matt Keogh
Video Discussion 3
22 June 2022
Video Link:https://youtu.be/_eK41IYXTUE Links to an external site.
Executive Summary
What are some of the key techniques/methods to communicate effectively as a Project Manager?
Communication can be a complicated topic at first, but as we break down and understand what it means to communicate, a Project Manager can navigate communication easily, and accomplish what is needed. In the past few weeks, we have been regularly talking about how important interpersonal skills are, which is why it is also a key technique for communicating effectively (Larson & Gray, 2021). A Project Manager cannot simply deliver orders to the team and expect them to receive that message (Groysberg & Slind, 2012).
A Project Manager needs to use the technique of getting close, gaining trust, listening well, and getting personal (Groysberg & Slind, 2012). Coincidentally these techniques go hand in hand with the traits of good leaders. A good leader must stay grounded, motivate people, and build cohesion in their team (Project Manager, 2012a).
If a Project manager can use their leadership traits, they can begin building trust with their team which will encourage the team members to listen to the Project Manager which will help them effectively communicate. I discussed before how important active listening is, and the same goes for the Project Manager, if he or she can listen well when team members are speaking and communicating with them, it helps to strengthen the cohesion of the team. When all team members have their trust, listen well, get close, and become more personal, effective communication will become easier and remain an integral part of the project.
Interpersonal skills are the number one way to communicate better
The best techniques to communicate effectively are
Getting close to the team, gaining the trust of the team, listening to the team, and getting personal with the team
Respect and active listening need to work both ways (both PM and team member)
PMs should use leadership traits to strengthen communication
A cohesive team communicates better
What are some do’s and don’ts as a Project Manager when communicating with project teams and stakeholders?
Effective communication does not only need to happen within a project team, it must also happen to external members such as stakeholders. There are always do’s and don’ts with communication, but it is also important to understand that a “do” within your project team may be a “don’t” to a stakeholder. Some of the “dos” of communication should be that you use effective listening, give feedback (this may be a “don’t” when communicating with stakeholders), pay attention to both the sender and receivers’ nonverbal, and consider the urgency of the message (Rajkumar, 2010).
We have extensively covered the need for effective/active listening, but I have not addressed giving feedback. Feedback can be a tricky subject, especially if the entire team is not used to receiving it. Since a good leader must be aware and mindful, they can better provide feedback, and work with anyone who may be uncomfortable with that subject (Rajkumar, 2010). Non-verbal communication may be the most difficult form of communication. A Project Manager must be attentive to what body language they are portraying when speaking, as well as how the receiver is postured. If you are delivering bad news you may want to appear in a more sympathetic way rather than acting carefree, this will allow the message to be received better. Urgency in a message can decide if the information is useful or not. If you have a time-sensitive message and wait too long to deliver it, it can become pointless (Rajkumar, 2010). Getting organized is one of the first steps a Project Manager needs to take, but it is also important to sustain that organization to effectively communicate urgency at all times (Project Manager, 2012b).
Some “don’ts” as a Project Manager are, keeping information to yourself, not closing the loop, and excluding the team from the conversation. As a Project Manager you may be “in charge”, but it does not mean you do not need assistance. A good leader solicits help from others, and that cannot be done if you are not sharing information (Project Manager, 2012b). Not only does keeping information to yourself hurt your team, but it can also be frustrating to stakeholders. If there is an agreement as to what information should be shared with stakeholders, and you keep that valuable information to yourself, it can create a problem or disagreement with the stakeholders leading to even further setbacks.
Closing the loop in a conversation solidifies that everyone is in agreeance and on the same page. If a Project Manager does not close the loops in communication, it can lead to ambiguity and confusion (Rajkumar, 2010). Excluding anyone from a conversation can be detrimental to not only team/stakeholder relationships, but to the project itself (Rajkumar, 2010). A project team needs to be as transparent as possible, whether that is within the team, or with the project stakeholders, and exclusion is a quick way to break down those relationships.
Effective “do’s” maybe “don’ts” outside of your team
Being attentive and organized helps a Project Manager avoid pitfalls
Do’s- use effective listening, give feedback, pay attention to both the sender and receiver’s nonverbal cues, consider the urgency of the message
Don’ts- keeping information to yourself, not closing the loop, and excluding the team from the conversation
What are the major components of the communication plan?
The major components of the communication plan are, what information is being shared, the target audience, when it will be shared, the method of communication, and who is delivering the message (Larson & Gray, 2021). By identifying relevant people or groups to be included in the communication plan you are reducing the need for passing redundant information. Including these major components also takes out any questions when urgent or important information must be passed. All members associated with the project must be familiar with the communication plan for it to be useful (Larson & Gray, 2021). During the planning phase, special care must be taken to include all contingencies when creating the communication plan, and you must be cognizant of the fact that changes may need to be made if the plan is not working effectively.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
You Can Also Place the Order In www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.