UAS Design and Operations Analysis Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
UAS Design and Operations Analysis Assignment
Writing Assignment: ARVL – UAS Design and Operations Analysis
Writer: we can use the UAV platform for this assignment to find missing hikers in the woods or eliminate wild pigs destroying farmers crops.
For this activity you will identify and examine a UAS application, construct a UAS design configuration, plan appropriate route (flight path) to conduct simulated operations, and analyze other critical factors to explore operational regulatory compliance. You will document and analyze your experience, including the identified discussion/writing elements in a document (approx 1,000 words), which must conform to the most recent version of APA formatting requirements. Use screen captures and open source images, as figures, to illustrate and support your work.
In support of this activity, you will need to perform and document the following:
Info: Design and Operational Analysis Structure
- Analyze and document the following:
- Use case (i.e., application) for a client who does not currently employ UAS, which would be supportable using hardware available in ARVL (i.e., your available toolkit; e.g., airframes, sensors, and other components required to successfully operate); discuss the specific need the use fulfills and what will be accomplished
- Customer or user, how they currently fill their need (if at all), and type of operation (public, civil, or military)
- UAS design configuration details, including rational supporting selection of components
- Regulatory framework to be used (e.g., Part 101/Sec. 333; Part 107; Public COA; Civil COA; SAC; etc.) and discussion of why it is most suited
- Overview of operation, including discussion of safety, efficiency, and effectiveness; identify how it differs from alternative users (e.g., civil from recreational and military)
- In ARVL’s UAS Assembly Area, construct and save your UAS configuration. When complete, proceed to the Flight Planning and Simulated Operational areas to build, save, and execute an appropriate flight plan in conformance with your specified operational overview. Feel free to experiment with different elements/components throughout these processes; document observations, including effectiveness, areas for improvement, and further operational takeaways for inclusion in your written analysis. ( writer please see below of a build UAV and its characteristics as well its flight plan)
- Select and identify the details of a real world area where your simulated operation could be conducted (lat/long coordinates, time of day/year) and identify what additional regulations and considerations would need to be met (e.g., State/Local laws and ordinances; unique geographical and weather features; airspace); provide detail and supporting evidence indicating how regulations affect real world UAS operations.
- Further address how technology, components, or processes not included in ARVL (i.e., not available in your toolkit) could be used to extend or augment current capabilities; making the case for hypothetical acquisition (of real world equipment, not simulated).
Your analysis should feature the following major headings:
- Introduction (featuring purpose of analysis and specific-application)
- Application Details
- Client (customer details)
- Design Configuration
- Operational Framework
- Concept of Operation
- Observations (from simulated design and operation, as well as real world regulatory/environmental analysis)
Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters. Submit your document by the end of the module week.
Please use this video as example for question no. 2 above.
This UAV has the following components:
4 stroke engine
80 watt generator
Infrared sensor with gimbal
Fuel capacity 75%
GCS Trailer with Large dish antenna.
UAV flight path over Yosemite environment.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.