Untreated ADHD Can Increase Criminal Behavior Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Untreated ADHD Can Increase Criminal Behavior Essay
Untreated ADHD can increase Criminal Behavior
The treatment of ADHD and the approaches to be employed are reliant on several factors including the age of the individuals suffering the disease, whether to be employed with other approaches and the comorbidities present. ADHD is a major issue in public health and can have negative effects on the families of the patient and society as a whole. As such, understanding the underlying factors of ADHD, its diagnosis and treatment approaches is crucial to how well the condition will be dealt with in the future. This paper looks into six research articles as part of the Capstone project and their studies of ADHD related subjects.
According to Lücke et al., 2017, CBT or cognitive behavioral therapy is characterized as the standard type of psychotherapy administered in adults suffering ADHD. The article recognizes that biological factors including chronic negative feedback during childhood can play a role in the characterization of ADHD as a developmental disorder and these cannot be addressed substantially using CBT. The article looks into schema therapy which has recently become popular for use as a therapy approach when it comes to chronic psychiatric disorders due to its effectiveness.
The therapy is centered on the targeting and identification of beliefs and dysfunctional patterns that are formed from experiences during childhood and encapsulated as early maladaptive schemas. The article also looks into studies that were used to demonstrate the increased prevalence of these schemas in ADHD suffering adults. As such, it analyzes the effectiveness and utilization of schema therapy and its potential in utilizing maladaptive schemas to treat ADHD. The effectiveness of the approach is bolstered when there are the influence and existence of secondary problems including impaired self-perception and poor coping mechanisms (Lücke et al., 2017). The article also cites the importance of conducting controlled randomized clinical studies to support the adoption of the approach and the analysis of its effectiveness in treating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD.
According to Pan et al., 2019, the article looks into a study that compares CBT alone to its combination with medication in terms of cognitive and social functions, self-esteem, emotional symptoms and core symptoms in patients suffering ADHD. The study provides proof that CBT is an effective approach when it comes to treating ADHD regardless of whether it is employed with medication or not. There were, however, broader improvements when CBT was employed with medication in executive function but not in clinical symptoms, as compared to the use of CBT alone.
This would, therefore, provide a scientific basis for the clinical selection of treatment options that would be based on the needs and characteristics of patients. The study was the first to be conducted in China to look into the efficacy of CBT with and without medication. The study showed that it can be effective in adults suffering ADHD and there were no overarching differences between the different groups when it came to emotions and core symptoms. CBT alone was found to be more effective for daily functions while its combination with medication was more effective on emotional functions (Pan et al., 2019). Moreover, the CBT treatment administered as part of the study with and without medication showed results of significant improvements in terms of functional and emotional outcomes and ADHD symptoms in its baseline.
According to Stavrou, 2019, the study was purposed on investigating the efficacy of the incorporation of mentalization and psychodynamic psychotherapy as approaches for treating ADHD and impairment in mentalization. It would also look into the links between ADHD in children and mentalization capacity. The study was based on the theory that there is a relationship between mentalization capacity and ADHD and that for children suffering mentalization capacity and ADHD, psychodynamic psychotherapy can be effective. The study engaged children who were previously diagnosed with mentalization impairment and ADHD treatment using psychotherapy, and this was combined with approaches that were focused on mentalization.
At the beginning and end of the treatment, the study employed Rorschach’s tests. The results of the study indicated that there was progress in terms of mentalization impairment and ADHD in the children studied and that there was also a link or relationship between ADHD and mentalization capacity (Stavrou, 2019). This would have positive implications in the treatment of ADHD with comorbidity with impairment in mentalization.
According to Molina, 2016, the perception of children when it comes to the behavior of their parents is crucial for their adjustment. It can be very challenging to raise children with ADHD and little is understood on how children suffering ADHD perceive their parents’ style of raising children. The article looked into a study that aimed to analyze how children with ADHD perceived control and acceptance in child-parent relationships. There was an analysis of how this perception relates to externalizing behaviors, impulsivity or hyperactivity, and inattention.
The study analyzed children with ADHD and those without ADHD attending psychotherapy, as well as those with unknown status of ADHD and not attending psychotherapy. The study included their parents. Analysis of variance indicated that children suffering ADHD perceived increased levels of pathological control in their maternal relationships as compared to the other two groups. Those children with unknown status and not attending psychotherapy showed higher extreme autonomy than the other two groups. There were also findings that the perception of extreme autonomy and pathological control by parents could be used to predict externalizing symptoms in ADHD suffering children.
In children without ADHD and attending psychotherapy, inattention could be predicted using the perceptions of pathological control and maternal acceptance. Moreover, perceived paternal acceptance and perceived maternal pathological control could be used to predict externalizing symptoms in children with ADHD and attending psychotherapy (Molina, 2016). As such, the study indicated the importance of considering the perceptions of children when it comes to their relationships with their parents on top of reports from their fathers on their behavior concerning ADHD.
According to Wieber et al., 2018, ADHD is a huge problem in public health and has numerous negative outcomes for the individuals who are affected that can be burdening to society and families. Even as non-pharmaceutical treatment options and pharmacological treatment encapsulated in a multimodal therapeutic approach is taken as the standard, the observation of MPH or methylphenidate treatment is important. This is due to its likely correspondence to the reduced utilization of other options for treatments. The article looks into a study geared towards the analysis of the perceived challenges and the practice of pediatricians when it comes to treatment and diagnosis of ADHD.
The study utilized an online survey analyzing perceived challenges, personal attitudes, and therapy and diagnostic procedures that were sent to an organization of pediatricians. The professionals reported that selecting a therapy was done based on the exchanges with children and parents and the children suffering ADHD. The pediatricians set up three meetings, two of which the child suffering ADHD attends. They report and include information from numerous sources before diagnosing. The challenges mentioned included limited resources, frequent comorbidities, and the subjective characteristics of diagnosis (Wieber et al., 2018).
The most frequent treatment approach was pharmacological therapy, then psychotherapy and lastly, occupational therapy. In terms of case management, the challenges included unfavorable public attitudes regarding medication and decreased availability of psychotherapy and youth and child psychiatry. The study found out that pediatricians make considerations of multimodal approaches to treating ADHD and indicate a high involvement of the children and their families in the selection of the therapy to be employed. There were also indications of the potential of improving the cooperation with other specialists including social workers and teachers in school (Wieber et al., 2018). There was also the potential for increased availability of ADHD information and psychotherapy.
According to Scholle et al., 2020, the article looked into a study that was aimed at the identification of the characteristics that could be utilized to predict the use of psychotherapy and/or medication after the commencing diagnosis of ADHD. The use of medication was associated with the male gender and diagnoses with comorbid conduct and developmental disorder, comorbid depression and hyperactivity. The use of psychotherapy alone was associated with emotional and conduct disorders, somatoform, comorbid neurotic and the male gender. Receiving both treatments, on the other hand, was associated with emotional and conduct disorders, somatoform, and neurotic and comorbid depressions.
The study indicated that in the instances of equal access to both options for treatment, those with externalizing symptoms, for instance, were increasingly prone to receive psychotherapy and or medication than an average child diagnosed with the condition. Additionally, patients with psychiatric comorbidities representing externalizing symptoms such as conduct disorders and internalizing symptoms such as anxiety and depression were increasingly likely to receive medication and psychotherapy. The reduced chances of receiving additional psychotherapy when it comes to mental retardation were identified and were taken as a reflection that there is slowly increasing empirical confirmation of the effectiveness of psychotherapy (Scholle et al., 2020). Other explanations included the likelihood of a lower percentage of psychotherapists who deal with the population of low IQ children.
The effectiveness of the schema therapy treatment approach for ADHD is bolstered when there are the influence and existence of secondary problems including impaired self-perception and poor coping mechanisms. CBT alone was found to be more effective for daily functions while its combination with medication was more effective on emotional functions. Perceived paternal acceptance and perceived maternal pathological control could be used to predict externalizing symptoms in children with ADHD and attending psychotherapy.
Experts indicated that selecting a therapy was done based on the exchange between children and parents and the children suffering from ADHD. Moreover, patients with psychiatric comorbidities representing externalizing symptoms and internalizing symptoms were increasingly likely to receive medication and psychotherapy. This paper looks into six research articles as part of the Capstone project and their studies of ADHD related subjects.
Lücke, C., Lam, A. P., Müller, H. H., & Philipsen, A. (2017). New psychotherapeutic approaches in adult ADHD: acknowledging biographical factors. Journal of neurology & neuromedicine, 2(7), 6-10. Retrieved from http://oops.uni-oldenburg.de/3352/1/2017-68_luecke_article_new-psychotherapeutic-approaches-in-adult-adhd–acknowledging-biographical-factors.pdf
Molina, M. F., & Musich, F. M. (2016). Perception of parenting style by children with ADHD and its relation with inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity and externalizing symptoms. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(5), 1656-1671. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10826-015-0316-2
Pan, M. R., Huang, F., Zhao, M. J., Wang, Y. F., Wang, Y. F., & Qian, Q. J. (2019). A comparison of efficacy between cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and CBT combined with medication in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Psychiatry research, 279, 23-33. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178119307437
Scholle, O., Fegert, J. M., Kollhorst, B., Öztürk, E. E., Riedel, O., & Kölch, M. (2020). Predictors for Receiving Medication and/or Psychotherapy in Children Newly Diagnosed With ADHD: A Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort Study. Journal of Attention Disorders, 1087054718816172. Retrieved from https://source.ymvkt.cn/30522406.pdf
Stavrou, P. D. (2019). Outcomes of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy with Incorporated Mentalization-Focused Approaches for Children with ADHD and Mentalization Impairment. EC Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 155-179. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b04a/0d5a7ae461300e03c70e7b97307b21e5d8c1.pdf
Wieber, F., Hotz, S., Albermann, K., Dratva, J., & von Rhein, M. (2018). Diagnostics and treatment of ADHD in Switzerland: A physician perspective on practice and challenges. European Journal of Public Health, 28(suppl_4), cky214-212. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article-pdf/doi/10.1093/eurpub/cky214.212/27466773/cky214.212.pdf
Untreated ADHD Can Increase Criminal Behavior Essay
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.